… flippancy and snark can be convincing, substantively convincing, without even making an argument. They convince socially, not rhetorically.
I suddenly understand my life a little better.
-
aeonra liked this
-
garde-enfant liked this
-
ierasemyselfagain liked this
-
ierasemyselfagain reblogged this from agrammar
-
pleasewatchus liked this
-
carte-bancaire liked this
-
desmondwilki23 liked this
-
games-of-bratz liked this
-
morgan-jerabek liked this
-
olivier-hournau liked this
-
musee-monaco liked this
-
newjerseycpa liked this
-
govermentgrants liked this
-
term-life-insurance liked this
-
boyds-bears-gettysburg liked this
-
compra-nos-estados-unidos liked this
-
lilyahoo reblogged this from agrammar
-
andrewtsks reblogged this from agrammar and added:
one of his oldest posts today,...I had never read it, so I bookmarked it
-
speedysnail reblogged this from agrammar
-
kevinglaser reblogged this from jaredcardwell and added:
a pretty good read:
-
jaredcardwell reblogged this from somethingchanged
-
selvedge reblogged this from agrammar
-
fluffynotes reblogged this from somethingchanged
-
crosspollinator reblogged this from somethingchanged and added:
Because it’s a subliminal argument. Or an aspirational one. Or at least flippancy is. Or, well, wait: Imagine a spectrum...
-
longlivecanapes reblogged this from somethingchanged
-
alexjcampbell reblogged this from somethingchanged
-
jrichmanesq reblogged this from somethingchanged and added:
For all the ex-Consumators following me, I think this pretty perfectly sums up what was so wonderful about that place,...
-
somethingchanged reblogged this from agrammar
-
rstevens reblogged this from agrammar and added:
I suddenly understand my life
-
bisceglie reblogged this from agrammar
